Here. From Carlos Aquino: There is a lot of talk about programming techniques, plataforms, languages and other technical issues. But, what about the ROI? Don't you even know what is ROI? ROI is the Return of the Investment and it is a magical word to the ones who emits your paychecks... Learn more with some papers about .NET ROI, Biztalk ROI and Streaming Media ROI.

Here. The one where I have my first meeting with an MS Sr. VP on the anniversary of my first month as an employee.

Here. The one where I play junior anthropologist in my ongoing attempt to understand and become a productive member of MS society.

On the anniversary of my first month at MS, I took my first meeting with a Sr. Vice President. I’m told that’s a big deal. One colleague who’d been at MS for a few years said, “Wow. You must be important. I expect that the first time I’ll be in a meeting with a Sr. VP will be at my firing.” In my case, it’s not that I’m important (I’m not) that got me involved with such a meeting; it’s that I have recently been asked to participate in a project that needed to meet with the VP to clarify some review feedback . Or, in other words, it was a pretty pedestrian “here’s what we’ve come up with since the last time we met” kind of meeting. What made it interesting was that it was with a Eric.

Imagine a company run as a strict meritocracy that’s one of the most important and profitable in it’s industry. Now imagine that this company has been around for a while and has acquired tens of thousands of employees in a multi-layered hierarchy, with only the best and the brightest surviving and the best of the best rising to the top. That’s MS. Billg is layer 1. Eric is at layer 4 w/ a small number of peers. I’m at layer 9 or, as I like to call it, “the bottom.” By all rights, that means that Eric should be “5″ smarter than me, and I can see him fitting comfortably into that category.

Had Eric wanted to shred us, I’m sure he could have. Luckily, it was a nice, calm, productive meeting w/ him cutting quickly to the main points (in spite of the fact that he was reading and making notes on our handouts while still listening to our presentation). He also make some pretty interesting comments, especially considering how little time I’m guessing he’s had to think about the problem space. At least one comment put me on a path that I like much better than the one I was on (although we’ll see how he feels about it at the next review). The comment that startled me most, however, was when he said that he read my site. If this is my last post from inside the big house, you’ll know how much he liked it. : )

Here. Eric has released a new version of CodeSmith w/ the expiration date removed. This version also includes the CollectionGen functionality, along w/ a whole lot more.

Here. From Pär: Connecting Borland C#Builder to DB2 UDB with Borland Data Providers for the Microsoft .NET Framework.

Here. From Ricky Datta: New command line tool for generating ado.net C# wrapper functions for SQL Server stored procedures.

Here. "The Windows Application Verifier (AppVerifier) examines executable programs for common application quality issues. Running this tool on an application aids a tester in detecting issues dealing with stability, security, and compatibility." This tool should be required for all QA departments, just like FxCop is required for all .NET developers. [staff.develop.com/candera/weblog2]